↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The association of sleep quality with dry eye disease: the Osaka study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 3,687)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
The association of sleep quality with dry eye disease: the Osaka study
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/opth.s99620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Motoko Kawashima, Miki Uchino, Norihiko Yokoi, Yuichi Uchino, Murat Dogru, Aoi Komuro, Yukiko Sonomura, Hiroaki Kato, Shigeru Kinoshita, Kazuo Tsubota

Abstract

To investigate the association of dry eye disease with sleep quality. In 2011, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among all the employees, mainly young and middle-aged Japanese office workers, who used visual display technology, at a company in Osaka, Japan (N=672; age range =26-64 years). The participants were classified according to the Japanese dry eye diagnosis criteria by dry eye examination results including the Schirmer test, fluorescein and lissamine green staining, tear film break-up time, and symptom questionnaire into three groups as follows: definite dry eye disease, probable dry eye disease, and no dry eye disease. To determine sleep quality, Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (global score) was implemented. The global score (range =0-21) was calculated by summing seven sleep variable scores (scale, 0-3); scores ≥5.5 indicated poor sleep. The total mean global score was 5.1±2.3 (completed N=383); 45% of the dry eye disease participants reported having poor sleep quality, while 34% of the no dry eye disease participants did so, with a significant difference found in the global score (P=0.002). Furthermore, a statistically significant association was observed between the global score and dry eye disease (P=0.005). Poor sleep quality is associated with dry eye disease, especially with dry eye symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Master 5 5%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 43 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 31%
Psychology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Unspecified 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 46 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#204,031
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#17
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,916
of 354,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.