↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Oral Spironolactone versus Conservative Treatment for Non-Resolving Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Real-Life Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
<p>Oral Spironolactone versus Conservative Treatment for Non-Resolving Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Real-Life Practice</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s260998
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suthasinee Sinawat, Watcharaporn Thongmee, Thuss Sanguansak, Wipada Laovirojjanakul, Supat Sinawat, Yosanan Yospaiboon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,119,269
of 18,934,527 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#793
of 2,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,579
of 300,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,934,527 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.