↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis infections

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis infections
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/idr.s81416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica A Donnelley, Elizabeth S Zhu, George R Thompson

Abstract

We have a limited arsenal with which to treat invasive fungal infections caused by Aspergillus and Mucorales. The morbidity and mortality for both pathogens remains high. A triazole antifungal, isavuconazole, was recently granted approval by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. A randomized double-blind comparison trial for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis found isavuconazole noninferior to voriconazole. A separate, open-label study evaluating the efficacy of isavuconazole in the treatment of mucormycosis found comparable response rates to amphotericin B and posaconazole treated historical controls. The prodrug isavuconazonium sulfate is commercially available in both an oral and intravenous formulation and is generally well tolerated. Isavuconazole's broad spectrum of activity, limited side effect profile, and favorable pharmacokinetics will likely solidify its place in therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,552,748
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#177
of 1,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,981
of 339,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.