↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Development of a Barthel Index based on dyspnea for patients with respiratory diseases
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/copd.s104376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Vitacca, Mara Paneroni, Paola Baiardi, Vito De Carolis, Elisabetta Zampogna, Stefano Belli, Mauro Carone, Antonio Spanevello, Bruno Balbi, Giorgio Bertolotti

Abstract

As Barthel Index (BI) quantifies motor impairment but not breathlessness, the use of only this index could underestimate disability in chronic respiratory disease (CRD). To our knowledge, no study evaluates both motor and respiratory disability in CRD during activities of daily living (ADLs) simultaneously and with a unique tool. The objective of this study was to propose for patients with CRD an additional tool for dyspnea assessment during ADLs based on BI items named Barthel Index dyspnea. Comprehensibility, reliability, internal consistency, validity, responsiveness, and ability to differentiate between disease groups were assessed on 219 subjects through an observational study performed in an in-hospital rehabilitation setting. Good comprehensibility, high reliability (interrater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.892-0.964] and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 [95% confidence interval 0.983-0.994]), good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.89), strong concurrent validity with 6 minute walking distance (Pearson r=-0.538, P<0.001) and Medical Research Council (Spearman r S=0.70, P<0.001), good responsiveness after rehabilitation (P<0.001), and good appropriateness of the index were found evidencing patients with different dyspnea severity. Divergent validity showed weak correlation (Pearson r=-0.38) comparing Barthel Index dyspnea and BI. The BI based on dyspnea perception proved to be reliable, sensitive, and adequate as a tool for measuring the level of dyspnea perceived in performing basic daily living activities. A unique instrument simultaneously administered may provide a global assessment of disability during ADLs incorporating both motor and respiratory aspects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Professor 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 39 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 18%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 43 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,688,172
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#902
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,590
of 353,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#26
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.