↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Peptide-coated gold nanoparticles for modulation of angiogenesis in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Peptide-coated gold nanoparticles for modulation of angiogenesis in vivo
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s108661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catarina Roma-Rodrigues, Amelie Heuer-Jungemann, Alexandra R Fernandes, Antonios G Kanaras, Pedro V Baptista

Abstract

In this work, peptides designed to selectively interact with cellular receptors involved in the regulation of angiogenesis were anchored to oligo-ethylene glycol-capped gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and used to evaluate the modulation of vascular development using an ex ovo chick chorioallantoic membrane assay. These nanoparticles alter the balance between naturally secreted pro- and antiangiogenic factors, under various biological conditions, without causing toxicity. Exposure of chorioallantoic membranes to AuNP-peptide activators of angiogenesis accelerated the formation of new arterioles when compared to scrambled peptide-coated nanoparticles. On the other hand, antiangiogenic AuNP-peptide conjugates were able to selectively inhibit angiogenesis in vivo. We demonstrated that AuNP vectorization is crucial for enhancing the effect of active peptides. Our data showed for the first time the effective control of activation or inhibition of blood vessel formation in chick embryo via AuNP-based formulations suitable for the selective modulation of angiogenesis, which is of paramount importance in applications where promotion of vascular growth is desirable (eg, wound healing) or ought to be contravened, as in cancer development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Unspecified 5 7%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Chemistry 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Unspecified 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,205,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#765
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,113
of 353,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#25
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.