The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Digital Treatment of Back Pain versus Standard of Care: The Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial, Rise-uP
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s260761 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janosch A Priebe, Katharina K Haas, Leida F Moreno Sanchez, Karin Schoefmann, Daniel A Utpadel-Fischler, Paul Stockert, Reinhard Thoma, Christine Schiessl, Linda Kerkemeyer, Volker Amelung, Siegfried Jedamzik, Jan Reichmann, Ursula Marschall, Thomas R Toelle |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Austria | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 79 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Psychology | 16 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 79 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#234,412
of 26,238,332 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#35
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,495
of 435,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.