↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Health and Gross National Happiness: review of current status in Bhutan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 979)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Health and Gross National Happiness: review of current status in Bhutan
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, August 2011
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s21095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tashi Tobgay, Ugen Dophu, Cristina E Torres, Kesara Na-Bangchang

Abstract

Worldwide, contemporary measures of the success of health development programs have been mostly in terms of the reduction of mortality and morbidity as well as increasing longevity. While these goals have yielded much-needed health improvements, the subjective outcomes of these improvements, as experienced by individuals and the communities, have not been considered. Bhutan, under the overarching policy of Gross National Happiness, has provided due consideration to these subjective indicators. Here, we report on the current status of health and happiness in Bhutan as revealed by conventional objective indicators and subjective Gross National Happiness indicators. The current literature on health in Bhutan in relation to the Gross National Happiness Survey conducted by the Centre of Bhutan Studies has been reviewed. Bhutan has made great strides within a short period of modernization, as shown by both objective and subjective indicators. Tremendous challenges lie ahead to achieve the ultimate goal of health and happiness, and how Bhutan articulates its path to modernization may be a lesson for the rest of the world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 25%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Psychology 10 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,436,053
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#44
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,919
of 124,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them