| Title |
Investigating patient expectations and treatment outcome in a chronic low back pain population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s28636 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristen B Sanderson, Daniela Roditi, Steven Z George, James W Atchison, Evangelia Banou, Michael E Robinson |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to measure the outcomes that patients consider clinically meaningful across four treatment domains - (1) pain, (2) fatigue, (3) emotional distress, and (4) level of interference - and determine if patients met their own success criteria. Additionally, the role of expectations in treatment outcome was examined. This study also aimed to determine how change in levels of pain, fatigue, disability, and level of interference varied according to the type of treatment delivered to participants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Norway | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 30% |
| Psychology | 14 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,405,477
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#581
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,072
of 250,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.