Title |
Retrospective chart review of a referenced EEG database in assisting medication selection for treatment of depression in patients with eating disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s22271 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James M Greenblatt, Craig Sussman, Mariko Jameson, Lee Yuan, Daniel A Hoffman, Dan V Iosifescu |
Abstract |
A retrospective chart review was undertaken in a private clinic to examine the clinical outcomes for patients with an eating disorder comorbid with depression or bipolar illness who underwent a referenced electroencephalographic (EEG) database analysis to help guide medication selection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2012.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2,192
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,984
of 136,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.