↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Update on the role of genetics in the onset of age-related macular degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Update on the role of genetics in the onset of age-related macular degeneration
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2011
DOI 10.2147/opth.s11627
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter James Francis, Michael L Klein

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), akin to other common age-related diseases, has a complex pathogenesis and arises from the interplay of genes, environmental factors, and personal characteristics. The past decade has seen very significant strides towards identification of those precise genetic variants associated with disease. That genes encoding proteins of the (alternative) complement pathway (CFH, C2, CFB, C3, CFI) are major players in etiology came as a surprise to many but has already lead to the development of therapies entering human clinical trials. Other genes replicated in many populations ARMS2, APOE, variants near TIMP3, and genes involved in lipid metabolism have also been implicated in disease pathogenesis. The genes discovered to date can be estimated to account for approximately 50% of the genetic variance of AMD and have been discovered by candidate gene approaches, pathway analysis, and latterly genome-wide association studies. Next generation sequencing modalities and meta-analysis techniques are being employed with the aim of identifying the remaining rarer but, perhaps, individually more significant sequence variations, linked to disease status. Complementary studies have also begun to utilize this genetic information to develop clinically useful algorithms to predict AMD risk and evaluate pharmacogenetics. In this article, contemporary commentary is provided on rapidly progressing efforts to elucidate the genetic pathogenesis of AMD as the field stands at the end of the first decade of the 21st century.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 30%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Mathematics 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,605
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,324
of 130,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.