↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Self-reported adherence supports patient preference for the single tablet regimen (STR) in the current cART era

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Self-reported adherence supports patient preference for the single tablet regimen (STR) in the current cART era
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s31385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaetana Sterrantino, Lucia Santoro, Dario Bartolozzi, Michele Trotta, Mauro Zaccarelli

Abstract

To analyze self-reported adherence to antiretroviral regimens containing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), raltegravir, and maraviroc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#914
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,769
of 179,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.