↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

What is infidelity? Perceptions based on biological sex and personality

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
What is infidelity? Perceptions based on biological sex and personality
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2011
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s16876
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Thornton, Alexander Nagurney

Abstract

The study examines perceptions of infidelity, paying particular attention to how these perceptions differ based on biological sex and personality traits, specifically agency and communion and their unmitigated counterparts. The study utilizes a sample of 125 male and 233 female college students. In addition to the personality measures, participants completed a 19-item checklist that assessed their perceptions of specific items that could potentially be construed as infidelity. It was hypothesized that females would construe more items as infidelity than would males. It was also predicted that unmitigated communion and communion would be positively correlated with these perceptions and that unmitigated agency would be negatively correlated with these perceptions. No correlation was predicted between agency and infidelity. All hypotheses were supported. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 21%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 34 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 37%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Linguistics 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,659,391
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#64
of 781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,860
of 122,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.