↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: its clinical potential

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: its clinical potential
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2012
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s23277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srdan Verstovsek, Ostojic, Vrhovac, Srdan Verstovsek

Abstract

Ruxolitinib is an orally bioavailable, selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), a bone marrow disease in which the JAK pathway is dysregulated, leading to impaired hematopoiesis and immune function. By inhibiting JAK1 and JAK2, ruxolitinib modulates cytokine-stimulated intracellular signaling. In a phase II clinical trial in patients with MF, ruxolitinib recipients exhibited durable reductions in spleen size, reductions in circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, improvements in physical activity, weight gain, and alleviation of symptoms (including constitutional symptoms) in patients with and without JAK2 mutation. These findings were confirmed by two phase III clinical MF studies, in which a greater proportion of ruxolitinib recipients achieved a spleen volume reduction of ≥35% from baseline at week 24, compared with placebo in one study (41.9% versus 0.7%; P < 0.0001) and with best available therapy in the other (31.9% versus 0%; P < 0.0001). Alleviation of MF symptoms and improvements in quality of life were also significantly greater in ruxolitinib recipients. Overall survival of patients treated with ruxolitinib was significantly longer than of those receiving the placebo. Owing to risks of potentially serious adverse effects, eg, myelosuppression, ruxolitinib should be used under close physician supervision. Longer follow-up of the phase III MF studies is needed to reach firm conclusions regarding ruxolitinib's capacity to modify the natural disease course.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Denmark 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Librarian 5 6%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Chemistry 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,050
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,340
of 168,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.