↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cost-effectiveness study of oral hypoglycemic agents in the treatment of outpatients with type 2 diabetes attending a public primary care clinic in Mexico City

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Cost-effectiveness study of oral hypoglycemic agents in the treatment of outpatients with type 2 diabetes attending a public primary care clinic in Mexico City
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2012
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s27826
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Díaz de León-Castañeda, Marina Altagracia-Martínez, Jaime Kravzov-Jinich, Ma del Rosario Cárdenas-Elizalde, Consuelo Moreno-Bonett, Juan Manuel Martínez-Núñez

Abstract

Worldwide, diabetes mellitus presents a high burden for individuals and society. In Latin America, many people with diabetes have limited access to health care, which means that indirect costs may exceed direct health care cost. Diabetes is Mexico's leading cause of death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Researcher 17 20%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 14%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,823,235
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#133
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,656
of 168,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them