↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Measuring children’s distress during burns dressing changes: literature search for measures appropriate for indigenous children in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Measuring children’s distress during burns dressing changes: literature search for measures appropriate for indigenous children in South Africa
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, September 2011
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s21821
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quinette Louw, Karen Grimmer-Somers, Angie Schrikk

Abstract

Virtual reality is consistently reported as effective in reducing pain and anxiety in children during burns dressing changes in recent Western studies. Pain scales are a commonly reported outcome measure. Virtual reality is persuasive for all children in distress during medical procedures, because it is a nonaddictive, novel, and inexpensive form of distraction which can be applied repeatedly with good effect. We intend to use virtual reality in South Africa for the many children hospitalized with severe burns from mechanisms rarely seen in the Western world (paraffin/kerosene stoves exploding, electrical fires, shack/township fires, boiling liquid spills). Many severely burnt children are indigenous South Africans who did not speak English, and whose illiteracy levels, cultures, family dynamics, and experiences of pain potentially invalidate the use of conventional pain scales as outcome measures. The purpose of this study was to identify objective measures with sound psychometric properties and strong clinical utility, to assess distress during burns dressing changes in hospitalized indigenous South African children. Choice of measures was constrained by the burns dressing change environment, the ethics of doing no harm whilst measuring distress in vulnerable children, and of capturing valid measures of distress over the entire burns dressing change procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Psychology 8 10%
Computer Science 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,791
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,260
of 136,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.