↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cancer patients’ perspectives on discontinuing depression treatment: the “drop out” phenomenon

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Cancer patients’ perspectives on discontinuing depression treatment: the “drop out” phenomenon
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, September 2011
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s24544
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anjanette A Wells, Lawrence A Palinkas, Xuxu Qiu, Kathleen Ell

Abstract

Adherence is a critical component of clinical intervention utility, but little is known about how cancer patients with depression, particularly low-income, ethnic minority patients, perceive adherence to and drop out from treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 30%
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 31%
Psychology 18 28%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,064
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,509
of 136,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.