| Title |
Beliefs that influence cost-related medication non-adherence among the “haves” and “have nots” with chronic diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s23111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John D Piette, Ashley Beard, Ann Marie Rosland, Colleen A McHorney |
| Abstract |
Some patients continue taking their medication as prescribed despite serious financial pressures, while others with the ability to pay forego treatment due to cost concerns. The primary goal of this study was to explore how patients' beliefs about the necessity of treatment and treatment side effects, influence cost-related non-adherence (CRN). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 25% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 13% |
| Psychology | 12 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,662,584
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#66
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,318
of 130,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.