↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss and its management with bisphosphonates in patients with breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast cancer targets and therapy, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss and its management with bisphosphonates in patients with breast cancer
Published in
Breast cancer targets and therapy, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/bctt.s29432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Bauer, Jane Bryce, Peyman Hadji

Abstract

Postmenopausal women have an increased risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis due to loss of the bone-protective effects of estrogen. Disease-related processes may also contribute to the risk of bone loss in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. One of the most common and severe safety issues associated with cancer therapy for patients with breast cancer is bone loss and the associated increase in risk of fractures. This paper reviews the recent literature pertaining to aromatase inhibitor (AI)-associated bone loss, and discusses suggested management and preventative approaches that may help patients remain on therapy to derive maximum clinical benefit. A case study is presented to illustrate the discussion. We observed that AIs are in widespread use for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and are now recommended as adjuvant therapy, either as primary therapy or sequential to tamoxifen, for postmenopausal women. AIs target the estrogen biosynthetic pathway and deprive tumor cells of the growth-promoting effects of estrogen, and AI therapies provide benefits to patients in terms of improved disease-free survival. However, there is a concern regarding the increased risk of bone loss with prolonged AI therapy, which can be managed in many cases with the use of bisphosphonates and other interventions (eg, calcium, vitamin D supplementation, exercise).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 20 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2012.
All research outputs
#21,251,718
of 26,097,697 outputs
Outputs from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#239
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,464
of 180,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,097,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.