↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Subgroup analysis of large trials can guide further research: a case study of vitamin E and pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Subgroup analysis of large trials can guide further research: a case study of vitamin E and pneumonia
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, February 2011
DOI 10.2147/clep.s16114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harri Hemila, Jaakko Kaprio

Abstract

Biology is complex and the effects of many interventions may vary between population groups. Subgroup analysis can give estimates for specific populations, but trials are usually too small for such analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Unknown 41 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 8 18%
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,711,123
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#261
of 757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,418
of 188,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.