| Title |
Hypotensive response after water-walking and land-walking exercise sessions in healthy trained and untrained women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s23094 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wasim Memon, Daniel Rodriguez, Jonato Prestes, Roberta Rica, Andrey Serra, Danilo Bocalini, Francisco Pontes, Valter Silva |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to compare post-exercise hypotension after acute sessions of water-walking and land-walking in healthy trained and untrained women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 9% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,615,244
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#238
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,499
of 119,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.