↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Improved patient outcome with smoking cessation: when is it too late?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Improved patient outcome with smoking cessation: when is it too late?
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2011
DOI 10.2147/copd.s10771
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Wu, Don D Sin

Abstract

Smoking is the leading modifiable risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and lung cancer. Smoking cessation is the only proven way of modifying the natural course of COPD. It is also the most effective way of reducing the risk for myocardial infarction and lung cancer. However, the full benefits of tobacco treatment may not be realized until many years of abstinence. All patients with COPD, regardless of severity, appear to benefit from tobacco treatment. Similarly, patients with recent CVD events also benefit from tobacco treatment. The risk of total mortality and rate of recurrence of lung cancer is substantially lower in smokers who manage to quit smoking following the diagnosis of early stage lung cancer or small cell lung cancer. Together, these data suggest that tobacco treatment is effective both as a primary and a secondary intervention in reducing total morbidity and mortality related to COPD, CVD, and lung cancer. In this paper, we summarize the evidence for tobacco treatment and the methods by which smoking cessation can be promoted in smokers with lung disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 27%
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 46 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,580,696
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#99
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,476
of 121,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them