↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Narcolepsy: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Narcolepsy: a review
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2011
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s23624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gbolagade Sunmaila Akintomide, Hugh Rickards

Abstract

Narcolepsy is a lifelong sleep disorder characterized by a classic tetrad of excessive daytime sleepiness with irresistible sleep attacks, cataplexy (sudden bilateral loss of muscle tone), hypnagogic hallucination, and sleep paralysis. There are two distinct groups of patients, ie, those having narcolepsy with cataplexy and those having narcolepsy without cataplexy. Narcolepsy affects 0.05% of the population. It has a negative effect on the quality of life of its sufferers and can restrict them from certain careers and activities. There have been advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of narcolepsy. It is thought that narcolepsy with cataplexy is secondary to loss of hypothalamic hypocretin neurons in those genetically predisposed to the disorder by possession of human leukocyte antigen DQB1*0602. The diagnostic criteria for narcolepsy are based on symptoms, laboratory sleep tests, and serum levels of hypocretin. There is no cure for narcolepsy, and the present mainstay of treatment is pharmacological treatment along with lifestyle changes. Some novel treatments are also being developed and tried. This article critically appraises the evidence for diagnosis and treatment of narcolepsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 200 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 29%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 12 6%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 24%
Psychology 25 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 10%
Neuroscience 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 62 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,689,993
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#216
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,778
of 136,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.