| Title |
Guideline-based survey of outpatient COPD management by pulmonary specialists in Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s27887 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Glaab, Claus Vogelmeier, Andreas Hellmann, Roland Buhl |
| Abstract |
Little is known about the role of guidelines for the practical management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by office-based pulmonary specialists. The aim of this study was to assess their outpatient management in relation to current guideline recommendations for COPD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2012.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#945
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,147
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.