↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cost-effectiveness of available treatment options for patients suffering from severe COPD in the UK: a fully incremental analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Cost-effectiveness of available treatment options for patients suffering from severe COPD in the UK: a fully incremental analysis
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2012
DOI 10.2147/copd.s29820
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Hertel, Robert W Kotchie, Yevgeniy Samyshkin, Matthew Radford, Samantha Humphreys, Kevin Jameson

Abstract

Frequent exacerbations which are both costly and potentially life-threatening are a major concern to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), despite the availability of several treatment options. This study aimed to assess the lifetime costs and outcomes associated with alternative treatment regimens for patients with severe COPD in the UK setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 39%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,505,970
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#661
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,142
of 168,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.