↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, linear dose, crossover study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a green coffee bean extract in overweight subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,197)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
175 X users
facebook
76 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner
video
4 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, linear dose, crossover study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a green coffee bean extract in overweight subjects
Published in
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, January 2012
DOI 10.2147/dmso.s27665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joe A Vinson, Bryan R Burnham, Mysore V Nagendran

Abstract

Adult weight gain and obesity have become worldwide problems. Issues of cost and potential side effects of prescription weight loss drugs have led overweight and obese adults to try nutraceuticals that may aid weight loss. One promising nutraceutical is green coffee extract, which contains high concentrations of chlorogenic acids that are known to have health benefits and to influence glucose and fat metabolism. A 22-week crossover study was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of a commercial green coffee extract product GCA™ at reducing weight and body mass in 16 overweight adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Master 22 12%
Other 16 9%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Chemistry 8 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 418. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#71,110
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
#3
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253
of 252,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them