↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Treatment of dengue fever

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of dengue fever
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, July 2012
DOI 10.2147/idr.s22613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Senaka Rajapakse, Chaturaka Rodrigo, Anoja Rajapakse

Abstract

The endemic area for dengue fever extends over 60 countries, and approximately 2.5 billion people are at risk of infection. The incidence of dengue has multiplied many times over the last five decades at an alarming rate. In the endemic areas, waves of infection occur in epidemics, with thousands of individuals affected, creating a huge burden on the limited resources of a country's health care system. While the illness passes off as a simple febrile episode in many, a few have a severe illness marked by hypovolemic shock and bleeding. Iatrogenic fluid overload in the management may further complicate the picture. In this severe form dengue can be fatal. Tackling the burden of dengue is impeded by several issues, including a lack of understanding about the exact pathophysiology of the infection, inability to successfully control the vector population, lack of specific therapy against the virus, and the technical difficulties in developing a vaccine. This review provides an overview on the epidemiology, natural history, management strategies, and future directions for research on dengue, including the potential for development of a vaccine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 426 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 142 32%
Student > Master 54 12%
Student > Postgraduate 30 7%
Researcher 29 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 6%
Other 44 10%
Unknown 113 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 4%
Chemistry 13 3%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 119 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,379,457
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#231
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,120
of 177,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them