The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Toxicity and antibacterial assessment of chitosan-coated silver nanoparticles on human pathogens and macrophage cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s28077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prajna Jena, Soumitra Mohanty, Rojee Mallick, Biju Jacob, Avinash Sonawane |
| Abstract |
Pathogenic bacteria are able to develop various strategies to counteract the bactericidal action of antibiotics. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have emerged as a potential alternative to conventional antibiotics because of their potent antimicrobial properties. The purpose of this study was to synthesize chitosan-stabilized AgNPs (CS-AgNPs) and test for their cytotoxic, genotoxic, macrophage cell uptake, antibacterial, and antibiofilm activities. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 22% |
| Researcher | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 32 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 61 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,777,586
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#908
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,888
of 173,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#18
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.