↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effect of magnetic nanoparticles on apoptosis and cell cycle induced by wogonin in Raji cells

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Effect of magnetic nanoparticles on apoptosis and cell cycle induced by wogonin in Raji cells
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s28089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Wang, Haijun Zhang, Baoan Chen, Guohua Xia, Shuai Wang, Jian Cheng, Zeye Shao, Chong Gao, Wen Bao, Liang Tian, Yanyan Ren, Peipei Xu, Xiaohui Cai, Ran Liu, Xuemei Wang

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicine is gradually becoming a new source of anticancer drugs. One such example is wogonin, which is cytotoxic to various cancer cell lines in vitro. However, due to its low water solubility, wogonin is restricted to clinical administration. Recently, the application of drug-coated magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to increase water solubility of the drug and to enhance its chemotherapeutic efficiency has attracted much attention. In this study, wogonin was conjugated with the drug delivery system of MNPs by mechanical absorption polymerization to fabricate wogonin-loaded MNPs. It was demonstrated that MNPs could strengthen wogonin-induced cell inhibition, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest in Raji cells by methylthiazol tetrazolium assay, flow cytometer assay, and nuclear 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms of these phenomena were explored by western blot, in which the protein levels of caspase 8 and caspase 3 were increased significantly while those of survivin and cyclin E were decreased significantly in wogonin-MNPs group. These findings suggest that the combination of wogonin and MNPs provides a promising strategy for lymphoma therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 41%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Materials Science 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,113
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,034
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#59
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.