| Title |
Size- and charge-dependent non-specific uptake of PEGylated nanoparticles by macrophages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s28531 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shann S Yu, Cheryl M Lau, Susan N Thomas, W Gray Jerome, David J Maron, James H Dickerson, Jeffrey A Hubbell, Todd D Giorgio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 38% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 27 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 10% |
| Engineering | 19 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 50 | 24% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,340,716
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#484
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,533
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#10
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.