↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Influence of carbon nanotube length on toxicity to zebrafish embryos

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Influence of carbon nanotube length on toxicity to zebrafish embryos
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s30459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinping Cheng, Shuk Han Cheng

Abstract

There is currently a large difference of opinion in nanotoxicology studies of nanomaterials. There is concern about why some studies have indicated that there is strong toxicity, while others have not. In this study, the length of carbon nanotubes greatly affected their toxicity in zebrafish embryos. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were sonicated in a nitric acid solution for 24 hours and 48 hours. The modified MWCNTs were tested in early developing zebrafish embryo. MWCNTs prepared with the longer sonication time resulted in severe developmental toxicity; however, the shorter sonication time did not induce any obvious toxicity in the tested developing zebrafish embryos. The cellular and molecular changes of the affected zebrafish embryos were studied and the observed phenotypes scored. This study suggests that length plays an important role in the in vivo toxicity of functionalized CNTs. This study will help in furthering the understanding on current differences in toxicity studies of nanomaterials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Student > Master 13 20%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Chemistry 5 8%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#946
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,570
of 177,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#25
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.