↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Preparation and characterization of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles with anticoagulant activity

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Preparation and characterization of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles with anticoagulant activity
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s31632
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz Cláudio da Silva, Thiago Garcia, Michela Mori, Giuseppina Sandri, Maria Cristina Bonferoni, Priscila V Finotelli, Leonardo P Cinelli, Carla Caramella, Lúcio M Cabral

Abstract

The aim of this study was to produce and characterize nanoparticles (NPs), combining chondroitin sulfate (CS) and fucoidan (FC) with chitosan for therapeutic purposes. These NPs were characterized by dynamic light scattering, zeta potential determination, and transmission electronic microscopy. The anticoagulant activity was determined for FC NPs and compared with FC solution at the same concentration. FC NPs showed regular shapes and better anticoagulant activity than free polysaccharide solution. FC solution did not affect coagulation compared to FC NPs, which increased up to two-fold, even at a lower concentration. Cytotoxicity and permeability tests were conducted using Caco-2 cell monolayer, exhibiting no toxic effect in this cell line and higher permeability for NP2 samples than FC solution at the same concentration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 14%
Chemistry 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#946
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,661
of 179,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#23
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.