↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Flavonoids as GABAA receptor ligands: the whole story?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of experimental pharmacology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 147)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Flavonoids as GABAA receptor ligands: the whole story?
Published in
Journal of experimental pharmacology, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/jep.s23105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariel Marder

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and postoperative nausea and vomiting are one of the most frequent but also very concerning consequences for patients undergoing chemotherapy or surgical procedures under general anesthesia. There are a variety of mechanisms involved in the activation of nausea and vomiting. Serotonin, a ubiquitous central and peripheral neurotransmitter, is thought to be the predominant mediator of the perception of nausea and triggering of the vomiting response in both the brain and the periphery via the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT(3)) receptor pathways. 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists disrupt this pathway, largely at the level of the vagal afferent pathways, to decrease nausea and vomiting. This review will focus on dolasetron, an older but sill commonly used 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist and its multimodal mechanism of action, safety and tolerability, patient considerations, and a review of the current literature on its use to combat both chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting in these two important patient populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Algeria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 122 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Chemistry 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 36 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#37
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,147
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.