↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with or without low-dose intravenous ketamine analgesia: effective, simple, safe, and cheap alternative to conventional general anesthesia for selected…

Overview of attention for article published in Local and Regional Anesthesia , February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with or without low-dose intravenous ketamine analgesia: effective, simple, safe, and cheap alternative to conventional general anesthesia for selected neck surgeries
Published in
Local and Regional Anesthesia , February 2012
DOI 10.2147/lra.s28360
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandip Mukhopadhyay, Mausumi Niyogi, Manotosh Dutta, Ritam Ray, Ganesh Chandra Gayen, Monoj Mukherjee, Basabdatta Samanta Mukhopadhyay

Abstract

General anesthesia is commonly used for surgery in the neck region. Superficial cervical plexus block is adequate to produce anesthesia in the anterior and anterolateral aspects of the neck. Our aim was to observe the effectiveness of bilateral cervical plexus block for surgery in this region of the neck.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Student > Postgraduate 6 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Local and Regional Anesthesia
#81
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,034
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Local and Regional Anesthesia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them