↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Sleep paralysis in medieval Persia – the Hidayat of Akhawayni (? –983 AD)

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Sleep paralysis in medieval Persia – the Hidayat of Akhawayni (? –983 AD)
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s28231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samad EJ Golzari, Kazem Khodadoust, Farid Alakbarli, Kamyar Ghabili, Ziba Islambulchilar, Mohammadali M Shoja, Majid Khalili, Feridoon Abbasnejad, Niloufar Sheikholeslamzadeh, Nasrollah Moghaddam Shahabi, Seyed Fazel Hosseini, Khalil Ansarin

Abstract

Among the first three manuscripts written in Persian, Akhawayni's Hidayat al-muta'allemin fi al-tibb was the most significant work compiled in the 10th century. Along with the hundreds of chapters on hygiene, anatomy, physiology, symptoms and treatments of the diseases of various organs, there is a chapter on sleep paralysis (night-mare) prior to description and treatment of epilepsy. The present article is a review of the Akhawayni's teachings on sleep paralysis and of descriptions and treatments of sleep paralysis by the Greek, medieval, and Renaissance scholars. Akhawayni's descriptions along with other early writings provide insight into sleep paralysis during the Middle Ages in general and in Persia in particular.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Psychology 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,110,127
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#144
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,851
of 179,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.