↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Annual direct cost of dry eye in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Annual direct cost of dry eye in Japan
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s30625
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshinobu Mizuno, Masakazu Yamada, Chika Shigeyasu

Abstract

This study was performed to estimate the annual direct cost incurred by dry eye patients, which includes expenses for treatment and drugs, as well as the cost of punctal plugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 20 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#4,111,757
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#364
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,583
of 175,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.