Use of DNA microarray analysis in diagnosis of bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2012
Tsutomu Sakai, Kohzaki, Akira Watanabe, Hiroshi Tsuneoka, Shimadzu
To examine the utility of DNA microarray analysis for identifying causative microorganisms in endophthalmitis.
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of||1||100%|
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||16%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||8||42%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||4||21%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||5%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||5%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2012.
All research outputs
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
of 3,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 247,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.