↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Use of DNA microarray analysis in diagnosis of bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Use of DNA microarray analysis in diagnosis of bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s29230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsutomu Sakai, Kohzaki, Akira Watanabe, Hiroshi Tsuneoka, Shimadzu

Abstract

To examine the utility of DNA microarray analysis for identifying causative microorganisms in endophthalmitis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Other 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,836,208
of 12,488,808 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#706
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,231
of 119,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#12
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,488,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.