↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The impact of HIV clinical pharmacists on HIV treatment outcomes: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 1,769)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
The impact of HIV clinical pharmacists on HIV treatment outcomes: a systematic review
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, April 2012
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s30244
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parya Saberi, Betty J Dong, Mallory O Johnson, Ruth M Greenblatt, Jennifer M Cocohoba

Abstract

Due to the rapid proliferation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment options, there is a need for health care providers with knowledge of antiretroviral therapy intricacies. In a HIV multidisciplinary care team, the HIV pharmacist is well-equipped to provide this expertise. We conducted a systematic review to assess the impact of HIV pharmacists on HIV clinical outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 25%
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 10 8%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,013,195
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#40
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,875
of 173,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.