↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Self-care 3 months after attending chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a qualitative descriptive analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Self-care 3 months after attending chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a qualitative descriptive analysis
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, January 2012
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s28466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilla Askov Mousing, Kirsten Lomborg

Abstract

The authors performed a qualitative descriptive analysis to explore how group patient education influences the self-care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Professor 4 11%
Other 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#914
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,299
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.