↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A review of the pathology and treatment of canine respiratory infections

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 132)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
A review of the pathology and treatment of canine respiratory infections
Published in
Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/vmrr.s25021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miranda D Vieson, Pablo Piñeyro, Tanya LeRoith

Abstract

Numerous infectious agents are responsible for causing primary or secondary respiratory disease in dogs. These agents can cause upper or lower respiratory infections commonly observed in veterinary practices. Clinical signs might vary from mild dyspnea, sneezing, and coughing to severe pneumonia with systemic manifestations. Depending on the etiologic agent, the gross and microscopic changes observed during these infections can be rather unspecific or have highly characteristic patterns. While histopathology and cytology are not always required for diagnosis of respiratory infections, they are often useful for establishing a definitive diagnosis and identifying specific etiologic agents. Research regarding epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostics, and clinical manifestations related to these infectious pathogens provides valuable information that has improved treatments and management of the diseases they cause. This review discusses the epidemiology, general clinical characteristics, and pathologic lesions for some of the important viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic etiologies of canine respiratory disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 26 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 27 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#35
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,661
of 179,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them