↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

S1 gene sequence analysis of new variant isolates of avian infectious bronchitis virus in Tunisia

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
S1 gene sequence analysis of new variant isolates of avian infectious bronchitis virus in Tunisia
Published in
Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, July 2012
DOI 10.2147/vmrr.s32498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hager Bourogâa, Imen Hellal, Jihene Hassen, Imen Fathallah, Abdeljelil Ghram

Abstract

Tissue samples were collected from suspected broiler flocks showing respiratory signs to identify infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), characterize emerging field strains, and study their relationships with the Massachusetts H120 strain, the only IB vaccine used in Tunisia. Several IBV isolates were identified from field samples collected from flocks located in different regions in the northeast of Tunisia. The IBV isolates were characterized and compared to commonly used vaccine strains (including 793B, D274, and H120 types), other reference IBV strains from Europe, and the recently characterized Tunisian field variants TN20/00, TN200/01, and TN335/01. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and nucleotide sequencing analyses of the hypervariable regions of the S1 gene were carried out. Four new IBV variants were isolated during the period 2007-10 and were designated TN295/07, TN296/07, TN556/07, and TN557/07. The amino acid sequence data showed 100% similarity between TN295/07 and TN296/07, suggesting that these two isolates are identical and belong to the same genotype. Similar results were demonstrated for TN556/07 and TN557/07. Sequence identity values indicated that TN296/07 and TN556/07 share 55% amino acid homologies between each other, but are very different from the reference IBV serotypes, in particular the H120 strain. It was also shown that they have 50%-77% similarities with the Tunisian virus isolated between 2000 and 2001. Phylogenetic clustering allowed classification of these Tunisian isolates as new genotypes that are closer to TN200/01, TN335/01 Tunisian field variants, and Italy02 variant than MassH120 vaccine strain. S1 sequence analyses confirmed the cocirculation of H120 vaccine strain with novel IBV variants isolated from Tunisian field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 2 10%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Master 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 45%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2012.
All research outputs
#21,011,157
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#107
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,184
of 177,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.