↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for management of osteoarthritis in long-term care patients

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for management of osteoarthritis in long-term care patients
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, September 2011
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s24458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles E Argoff, F Michael Gloth

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is common in patients ≥65 years of age. Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often prescribed for osteoarthritis pain, they pose age-related cardiovascular, renal, and gastrointestinal risks. Two topical NSAIDs, diclofenac sodium 1% gel (DSG) and diclofenac sodium 1.5% in 45.5% dimethylsulfoxide solution (D-DMSO), are approved in the US for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain. Topical NSAIDs have shown efficacy and safety in knee (DSG, D-DMSO) and hand (DSG) osteoarthritis. Analyses of data from randomized controlled trials of DSG in hand and knee osteoarthritis demonstrate significant improvement of pain and function in both younger patients (<65 years) and older patients (≥65 years) and suggest good safety and tolerability. However, long-term safety data in older patients are limited. Topical NSAIDs can ease medication administration and help address barriers to pain management in older patients, such as taking multiple medications and inability to swallow, and are a valuable option for long-term care providers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#410
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,062
of 136,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.