↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The role of self-help in the treatment of mild anxiety disorders in young people: an evidence-based review

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The role of self-help in the treatment of mild anxiety disorders in young people: an evidence-based review
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s23357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debra Rickwood, Sally Bradford

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health problems experienced by young people, and even mild anxiety can significantly limit social, emotional, and cognitive development into adulthood. It is, therefore, essential that anxiety is treated as early and effectively as possible. Young people are unlikely, however, to seek professional treatment for their problems, increasing their chance of serious long-term problems such as impaired peer relations and low self-esteem. The barriers young people face to accessing services are well documented, and self-help resources may provide an alternative option to respond to early manifestations of anxiety disorders. This article reviews the potential benefits of self-help treatments for anxiety and the evidence for their effectiveness. Despite using inclusive review criteria, only six relevant studies were found. The results of these studies show that there is some evidence for the use of self-help interventions for anxiety in young people, but like the research with adult populations, the overall quality of the studies is poor and there is need for further and more rigorous research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 19%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 36 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,629,404
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#99
of 778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,608
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.