↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Beliefs about antipsychotic versus hypoglycemic medications among individuals with serious mental illness and type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Beliefs about antipsychotic versus hypoglycemic medications among individuals with serious mental illness and type 2 diabetes
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, May 2012
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s30975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Aakre, Deborah Medoff, Lisa Beth Dixon, Julie Kreyenbuhl

Abstract

This study compared the beliefs held by individuals with coexisting serious mental illness and type 2 diabetes regarding the necessity and risks of taking antipsychotic versus hypoglycemic medications. We also investigated whether nonadherent patients differed from adherent patients in their beliefs about medications.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Other 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 44%
Psychology 8 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,857,268
of 12,522,829 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#635
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,345
of 119,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,522,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.