| Title |
Patterns and predictors of treatment initiation and completion in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s30111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian T Clark, Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao, Liana Fraenkel |
| Abstract |
Guidelines for hepatitis C (HCV) strongly recommend antiviral treatment for patients with more severe liver disease given their increased risk of developing cirrhosis and other liver-related complications. Despite the proven benefits of therapy, 70%-88% of patients chronically infected with HCV do not undergo treatment. The goal of this paper is to describe patterns of treatment initiation among patients with both mild and severe disease and to assess the factors that are associated with treatment initiation and completion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,722,913
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,001
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,576
of 173,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.