| Title |
Surgical outcomes of the Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device in African American and white glaucoma patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s32282 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarwat Salim, Haiming Du, Sumalee Boonyaleephan, Jim Wan |
| Abstract |
To compare the surgical outcomes of the Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device in African American and white glaucoma patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 29% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 71% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,917,568
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,079
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,482
of 179,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#16
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.