| Title |
Pain and accuracy of focal laser treatment for diabetic macular edema using a retinal navigated laser (Navilas®)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s27859 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcus Kernt, Raoul E Cheuteu, Sarah Cserhati, Florian Seidensticker, Raffael G Liegl, Julian Lang, Christos Haritoglou, Anselm Kampik, Michael W Ulbig, Aljoscha S Neubauer |
| Abstract |
To investigate treatment-related pain and the accuracy of navigated laser photocoagulation in the treatment of clinically significant macular edema. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#704
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,147
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.