↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The warfarin–cranberry juice interaction revisited: A systematic in vitro–in vivo evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of experimental pharmacology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
The warfarin–cranberry juice interaction revisited: A systematic in vitro–in vivo evaluation
Published in
Journal of experimental pharmacology, July 2010
DOI 10.2147/jep.s11719
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ngoc Ngo, Scott J Brantley, Daniel R Carrizosa, Angela DM Kashuba, E Claire Dees, David J Kroll, Nicholas H Oberlies, Mary F Paine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cranberry products have been implicated in several case reports to enhance the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. The mechanism could involve inhibition of the hepatic CYP2C9-mediated metabolic clearance of warfarin by components in cranberry. Because dietary/natural substances vary substantially in bioactive ingredient composition, multiple cranberry products were evaluated in vitro before testing this hypothesis in vivo. METHODS: The inhibitory effects of five types of cranberry juices were compared with those of water on CYP2C9 activity (S-warfarin 7-hydroxylation) in human liver microsomes (HLM). The most potent juice was compared with water on S/R-warfarin pharmacokinetics in 16 healthy participants given a single dose of warfarin 10 mg. RESULTS: Only one juice inhibited S-warfarin 7-hydroxylation in HLM in a concentration-dependent manner (P < 0.05), from 20% to >95% at 0.05% to 0.5% juice (v/v), respectively. However, this juice had no effect on the geometric mean AUC(0-∞) and terminal half-life of S/R-warfarin in human subjects. CONCLUSIONS: A cranberry juice that inhibited warfarin metabolism in HLM had no effect on warfarin clearance in healthy participants. The lack of an in vitro-in vivo concordance likely reflects the fact that the site of warfarin metabolism (liver) is remote from the site of exposure to the inhibitory components in the cranberry juice (intestine).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#22,785,577
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#120
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,054
of 103,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them