↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimal management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 801)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
13 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Optimal management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, August 2010
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s6794
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neda Ebrahimi, Caroline Maltepe, Adrienne Einarson

Abstract

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is a common medical condition in pregnancy with significant physical and psychological morbidity. Up to 90% of women will suffer from NVP symptoms in the first trimester of pregnancy with up to 2% developing hyperemesis gravidarum which is NVP at its worst, leading to hospitalization and even death in extreme cases. Optimal management of NVP begins with nonpharmacological approaches, use of ginger, acupressure, vitamin B6, and dietary adjustments. The positive impact of these noninvasive, inexpensive and safe methods has been demonstrated. Pharmacological treatments are available with varying effectiveness; however, the only drug marketed specifically for the treatment of NVP in pregnancy is Diclectin(®) (vitamin B6 and doxylamine). In addition, the Motherisk algorithm provides a guideline for use of safe and effective drugs for the treatment of NVP. Optimal medical management of symptoms will ensure the mental and physical wellbeing of expecting mothers and their developing babies during this often stressful and difficult time period. Dismissing NVP as an inconsequential part of pregnancy can have serious ramifications for both mother and baby.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 26%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Lecturer 11 5%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 51 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#597,318
of 23,402,852 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#32
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,503
of 95,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,402,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.