| Title |
Cell type-dependent uptake, localization, and cytotoxicity of 1.9 nm gold nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s31751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan A Coulter, Suneil Jain, Karl T Butterworth, Laura E Taggart, Glenn R Dickson, Stephen J McMahon, Wendy B Hyland, Mark F Muir, Coleman Trainor, Alan R Hounsell, Joe M O’Sullivan, Giuseppe Schettino, Fred J Currell, David G Hirst, Kevin M Prise |
| Abstract |
This follow-up study aims to determine the physical parameters which govern the differential radiosensitization capacity of two tumor cell lines and one immortalized normal cell line to 1.9 nm gold nanoparticles. In addition to comparing the uptake potential, localization, and cytotoxicity of 1.9 nm gold nanoparticles, the current study also draws on comparisons between nanoparticle size and total nanoparticle uptake based on previously published data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 31 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,113
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,316
of 179,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#71
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.