↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Influence of nanomaterials on stem cell differentiation: designing an appropriate nanobiointerface

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Influence of nanomaterials on stem cell differentiation: designing an appropriate nanobiointerface
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s29975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioana Ilie, Razvan Ilie, Teodora Mocan, Dana Bartos, Lucian Mocan

Abstract

During the last decade, due to advances in functionalization chemistry, novel nanobiomaterials with applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have been developed. These novel materials with their unique physical and chemical properties are bioactive hierarchical structures that hold great promise for future development of human tissues. Thus, various nanomaterials are currently being intensively explored in the directed differentiation of stem cells, the design of novel bioactive scaffolds, and new research avenues towards tissue regeneration. This paper illustrates the latest achievements in the applications of nanotechnology in tissue engineering in the field of regenerative medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Materials Science 11 11%
Engineering 9 9%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,128
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,137
of 173,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#54
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.